Skip to content

Font Awesome vs RebelMouse

Based on 559 and 4 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View RebelMouse details
MetricFont AwesomeRebelMouseWinner
Performance4443Font Awesome
Accessibility8788RebelMouse
Best Practices8786Font Awesome
SEO9194RebelMouse
Security6561Font Awesome
TTFB456ms301msRebelMouse
Composite7372Font Awesome
Performance
Font Awesome
44
RebelMouse
43
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
RebelMouse
88
Security
Font Awesome
65
RebelMouse
61
SEO
Font Awesome
91
RebelMouse
94
Composite
Font Awesome
73
RebelMouse
72

Font Awesome outperforms RebelMouse in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). RebelMouse leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose RebelMouse

Choose RebelMouse when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 559 audited Font Awesome sites and 4 audited RebelMouse sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or RebelMouse?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or RebelMouse?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or RebelMouse?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor RebelMouse (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or RebelMouse?
RebelMouse sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or RebelMouse?
RebelMouse sites show lower Time to First Byte (301 ms vs 456 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or RebelMouse for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback