Skip to content

Font Awesome vs scrollreveal

Based on 756 and 11 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View scrollreveal details
MetricFont AwesomescrollrevealWinner
Performance4647scrollreveal
Accessibility8785Font Awesome
Best Practices8986Font Awesome
SEO9191Tie
Security6970scrollreveal
TTFB539ms297msscrollreveal
Composite7576scrollreveal
Performance
Font Awesome
46
scrollreveal
47
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
scrollreveal
85
Security
Font Awesome
69
scrollreveal
70
SEO
Font Awesome
91
scrollreveal
91
Composite
Font Awesome
75
scrollreveal
76

scrollreveal outperforms Font Awesome in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). Font Awesome leads in accessibility, best practices.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose scrollreveal

Choose scrollreveal when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 756 audited Font Awesome sites and 11 audited scrollreveal sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or scrollreveal?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, scrollreveal sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or scrollreveal?
scrollreveal sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or scrollreveal?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Font Awesome (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or scrollreveal?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or scrollreveal?
scrollreveal sites show lower Time to First Byte (297 ms vs 539 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or scrollreveal for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. scrollreveal scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback