Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Site Search 360

Based on 641 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Site Search 360 details
MetricFont AwesomeSite Search 360Winner
Performance4654Site Search 360
Accessibility8671Font Awesome
Best Practices88100Site Search 360
SEO9185Font Awesome
Security6761Font Awesome
TTFB463ms166msSite Search 360
Composite7473Font Awesome
Performance
Font Awesome
46
Site Search 360
54
Accessibility
Font Awesome
86
Site Search 360
71
Security
Font Awesome
67
Site Search 360
61
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Site Search 360
85
Composite
Font Awesome
74
Site Search 360
73

Font Awesome outperforms Site Search 360 in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Site Search 360 leads in performance, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Site Search 360

Choose Site Search 360 when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 641 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited Site Search 360 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Site Search 360?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Site Search 360 sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Site Search 360?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Site Search 360?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Font Awesome (86 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Site Search 360?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Site Search 360?
Site Search 360 sites show lower Time to First Byte (166 ms vs 463 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Site Search 360 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Site Search 360 scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback