Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Talentegy

Based on 548 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Talentegy details
MetricFont AwesomeTalentegyWinner
Performance4424Font Awesome
Accessibility8790Talentegy
Best Practices8773Font Awesome
SEO9185Font Awesome
Security6580Talentegy
TTFB454ms222msTalentegy
Composite7381Talentegy
Performance
Font Awesome
44
Talentegy
24
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
Talentegy
90
Security
Font Awesome
65
Talentegy
80
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Talentegy
85
Composite
Font Awesome
73
Talentegy
81

Talentegy outperforms Font Awesome in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 73). Font Awesome leads in performance, best practices, SEO.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Talentegy

Choose Talentegy when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 548 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited Talentegy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Talentegy?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 24 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Talentegy?
Talentegy sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Talentegy?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Talentegy (90 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Talentegy?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Talentegy?
Talentegy sites show lower Time to First Byte (222 ms vs 454 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Talentegy for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback