Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Typed.js

Based on 515 and 1 real audits

MetricFont AwesomeTyped.jsWinner
Performance4356Typed.js
Accessibility8788Typed.js
Best Practices8796Typed.js
SEO9191Tie
Security6461Font Awesome
TTFB439ms851msFont Awesome
Composite7372Font Awesome
Performance
Font Awesome
43
Typed.js
56
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
Typed.js
88
Security
Font Awesome
64
Typed.js
61
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Typed.js
91
Composite
Font Awesome
73
Typed.js
72

Font Awesome and Typed.js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Font Awesome has a composite score of 73 while Typed.js scores 72.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Typed.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Typed.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Typed.js?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 61 on average).
Should I choose Font Awesome or Typed.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Typed.js scores higher on performance while Font Awesome may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback