Skip to content

Font Awesome vs W3 Total Cache

Based on 515 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View W3 Total Cache details
MetricFont AwesomeW3 Total CacheWinner
Performance4374W3 Total Cache
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices87100W3 Total Cache
SEO9192W3 Total Cache
Security6460Font Awesome
TTFB439ms1023msFont Awesome
Composite7375W3 Total Cache
Performance
Font Awesome
43
W3 Total Cache
74
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
W3 Total Cache
87
Security
Font Awesome
64
W3 Total Cache
60
SEO
Font Awesome
91
W3 Total Cache
92
Composite
Font Awesome
73
W3 Total Cache
75

W3 Total Cache outperforms Font Awesome in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Font Awesome leads in security, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or W3 Total Cache?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, W3 Total Cache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (74 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or W3 Total Cache?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 60 on average).
Should I choose Font Awesome or W3 Total Cache for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. W3 Total Cache scores higher on performance while Font Awesome may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback