Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Yett

Based on 575 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Yett details
MetricFont AwesomeYettWinner
Performance4430Font Awesome
Accessibility87100Yett
Best Practices8781Font Awesome
SEO9192Yett
Security6564Font Awesome
TTFB453ms125msYett
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Font Awesome
44
Yett
30
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
Yett
100
Security
Font Awesome
65
Yett
64
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Yett
92
Composite
Font Awesome
73
Yett
73

Font Awesome and Yett are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Font Awesome has a composite score of 73 while Yett scores 73.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Yett

Choose Yett when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 575 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited Yett sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Yett?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Yett?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Yett?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Yett (100 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Yett?
Yett sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Yett?
Yett sites show lower Time to First Byte (125 ms vs 453 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Yett for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback