Based on 6 and 71 real audits
| Metric | FontServer | RankMath SEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 56 | 53 | FontServer |
| Accessibility | 96 | 89 | FontServer |
| Best Practices | 93 | 90 | FontServer |
| SEO | 92 | 94 | RankMath SEO |
| Security | 85 | 74 | FontServer |
| TTFB | 2706ms | 850ms | RankMath SEO |
| Composite | 84 | 79 | FontServer |
FontServer outperforms RankMath SEO in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (84 vs 79). RankMath SEO leads in SEO, TTFB.
Choose FontServer when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose RankMath SEO when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 6 audited FontServer sites and 71 audited RankMath SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback