Based on 4 and 2116 real audits
| Metric | Formalize CSS | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 42 | Formalize CSS |
| Accessibility | 81 | 87 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 83 | 86 | Google Analytics |
| SEO | 81 | 91 | Google Analytics |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 96ms | 428ms | Formalize CSS |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | Formalize CSS |
Formalize CSS and Google Analytics are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Formalize CSS has a composite score of 76 while Google Analytics scores 74.
Choose Formalize CSS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Formalize CSS sites and 2116 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback