| Metric | FormAssembly | GSAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 31 | 35 | GSAP |
| Accessibility | 90 | 89 | FormAssembly |
| Best Practices | 78 | 86 | GSAP |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | FormAssembly |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 78ms | 310ms | FormAssembly |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | GSAP |
FormAssembly and GSAP are closely matched, each leading in different categories. FormAssembly has a composite score of 71 while GSAP scores 73.
Choose FormAssembly when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose GSAP when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited FormAssembly sites and 228 audited GSAP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback