Based on 2 and 177 real audits
| Metric | Formidable Form | New Relic | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 35 | Formidable Form |
| Accessibility | 100 | 89 | Formidable Form |
| Best Practices | 81 | 85 | New Relic |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | Formidable Form |
| Security | 71 | 65 | Formidable Form |
| TTFB | 248ms | 236ms | New Relic |
| Composite | 76 | 72 | Formidable Form |
Formidable Form outperforms New Relic in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 72). New Relic leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Formidable Form when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose New Relic when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Formidable Form sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback