Based on 35 and 4469 real audits
| Metric | Foundation | Google Search Console | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 46 | Google Search Console |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 87 | Google Search Console |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 69 | Google Search Console |
| TTFB | 556ms | 371ms | Google Search Console |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Google Search Console |
Google Search Console outperforms Foundation in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Foundation leads in no categories.
Foundation doesn't clearly lead Google Search Console in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 35 audited Foundation sites and 4469 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback