Based on 33 and 930 real audits
| Metric | Foundation | WordPress | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 48 | WordPress |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 87 | WordPress |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 68 | WordPress |
| TTFB | 484ms | 458ms | WordPress |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | WordPress |
WordPress outperforms Foundation in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Foundation leads in no categories.
Foundation doesn't clearly lead WordPress in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose WordPress when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 33 audited Foundation sites and 930 audited WordPress sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback