Skip to content

Framer Motion vs Framer Sites

Based on 93 and 14 real audits

MetricFramer MotionFramer SitesWinner
Performance4146Framer Sites
Accessibility8887Framer Motion
Best Practices9090Tie
SEO9392Framer Motion
Security6669Framer Sites
TTFB259ms237msFramer Sites
Composite7475Framer Sites
Performance
Framer Motion
41
Framer Sites
46
Accessibility
Framer Motion
88
Framer Sites
87
Security
Framer Motion
66
Framer Sites
69
SEO
Framer Motion
93
Framer Sites
92
Composite
Framer Motion
74
Framer Sites
75

Framer Sites outperforms Framer Motion in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Framer Motion leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Framer Motion

Choose Framer Motion when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Framer Sites

Choose Framer Sites when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 93 audited Framer Motion sites and 14 audited Framer Sites sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Framer Motion or Framer Sites?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Framer Sites sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Framer Motion or Framer Sites?
Framer Sites sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Framer Motion or Framer Sites?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Framer Motion (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Framer Motion or Framer Sites?
Framer Motion sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Framer Motion or Framer Sites?
Framer Sites sites show lower Time to First Byte (237 ms vs 259 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Framer Motion or Framer Sites for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Framer Sites scores higher on overall composite score while Framer Motion may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback