Based on 93 and 14 real audits
| Metric | Framer Motion | Framer Sites | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 46 | Framer Sites |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Framer Motion |
| Best Practices | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| SEO | 93 | 92 | Framer Motion |
| Security | 66 | 69 | Framer Sites |
| TTFB | 259ms | 237ms | Framer Sites |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Framer Sites |
Framer Sites outperforms Framer Motion in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Framer Motion leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Framer Motion when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Framer Sites when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 93 audited Framer Motion sites and 14 audited Framer Sites sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback