Skip to content

Framer Motion vs Mux

Based on 97 and 4 real audits

View Framer Motion details | View Mux details
MetricFramer MotionMuxWinner
Performance4136Framer Motion
Accessibility8992Mux
Best Practices9095Mux
SEO9398Mux
Security6766Framer Motion
TTFB327ms141msMux
Composite7473Framer Motion
Performance
Framer Motion
41
Mux
36
Accessibility
Framer Motion
89
Mux
92
Security
Framer Motion
67
Mux
66
SEO
Framer Motion
93
Mux
98
Composite
Framer Motion
74
Mux
73

Mux outperforms Framer Motion in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Framer Motion leads in performance, security, composite score.

When to choose Framer Motion

Choose Framer Motion when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Mux

Choose Mux when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 97 audited Framer Motion sites and 4 audited Mux sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Framer Motion or Mux?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Framer Motion sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Framer Motion or Mux?
Framer Motion sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Framer Motion or Mux?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Mux (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Framer Motion or Mux?
Mux sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (98 vs 93 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Framer Motion or Mux?
Mux sites show lower Time to First Byte (141 ms vs 327 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Framer Motion or Mux for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Framer Motion scores higher on overall composite score while Framer Motion may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback