Based on 14 and 1895 real audits
| Metric | Framer Sites | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 41 | Framer Sites |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 90 | 85 | Framer Sites |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Framer Sites |
| Security | 69 | 64 | Framer Sites |
| TTFB | 237ms | 400ms | Framer Sites |
| Composite | 75 | 73 | Framer Sites |
Framer Sites outperforms Google Analytics in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in no categories.
Choose Framer Sites when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Google Analytics doesn't clearly lead Framer Sites in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 14 audited Framer Sites sites and 1895 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback