Skip to content

Framer Sites vs Google Analytics

Based on 14 and 1895 real audits

MetricFramer SitesGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance4641Framer Sites
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices9085Framer Sites
SEO9291Framer Sites
Security6964Framer Sites
TTFB237ms400msFramer Sites
Composite7573Framer Sites
Performance
Framer Sites
46
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
Framer Sites
87
Google Analytics
87
Security
Framer Sites
69
Google Analytics
64
SEO
Framer Sites
92
Google Analytics
91
Composite
Framer Sites
75
Google Analytics
73

Framer Sites outperforms Google Analytics in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in no categories.

When to choose Framer Sites

Choose Framer Sites when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Google Analytics doesn't clearly lead Framer Sites in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 14 audited Framer Sites sites and 1895 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Framer Sites or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Framer Sites sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Framer Sites or Google Analytics?
Framer Sites sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Framer Sites or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Framer Sites (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Framer Sites or Google Analytics?
Framer Sites sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Framer Sites or Google Analytics?
Framer Sites sites show lower Time to First Byte (237 ms vs 400 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Framer Sites or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Framer Sites scores higher on overall composite score while Framer Sites may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback