Based on 16 and 2288 real audits
| Metric | Framer Sites | Priority Hints | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 50 | Priority Hints |
| Accessibility | 87 | 91 | Priority Hints |
| Best Practices | 91 | 90 | Framer Sites |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 72 | Priority Hints |
| TTFB | 223ms | 434ms | Framer Sites |
| Composite | 76 | 78 | Priority Hints |
Priority Hints outperforms Framer Sites in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 76). Framer Sites leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Framer Sites when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 16 audited Framer Sites sites and 2288 audited Priority Hints sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback