Skip to content

FreakOut vs HSTS

Based on 1 and 3294 real audits

View FreakOut details | View HSTS details
MetricFreakOutHSTSWinner
Performance5053HSTS
Accessibility7590HSTS
Best Practices7789HSTS
SEO10092FreakOut
Security6073HSTS
TTFB2339ms403msHSTS
Composite6878HSTS
Performance
FreakOut
50
HSTS
53
Accessibility
FreakOut
75
HSTS
90
Security
FreakOut
60
HSTS
73
SEO
FreakOut
100
HSTS
92
Composite
FreakOut
68
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms FreakOut in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 68). FreakOut leads in SEO.

When to choose FreakOut

Choose FreakOut when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited FreakOut sites and 3294 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, FreakOut or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 50 on average).
Which has better security, FreakOut or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, FreakOut or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 75). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, FreakOut or HSTS?
FreakOut sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), FreakOut or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (403 ms vs 2339 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose FreakOut or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while FreakOut may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback