Skip to content

Fresh vs Microsoft

Based on 1 and 2444 real audits

View Fresh details | View Microsoft details
MetricFreshMicrosoftWinner
Performance4139Fresh
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices10086Fresh
SEO9289Fresh
Security7167Fresh
TTFB855ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7673Fresh
Performance
Fresh
41
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Fresh
89
Microsoft
89
Security
Fresh
71
Microsoft
67
SEO
Fresh
92
Microsoft
89
Composite
Fresh
76
Microsoft
73

Fresh outperforms Microsoft in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Microsoft leads in TTFB.

When to choose Fresh

Choose Fresh when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Fresh sites and 2444 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Fresh or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Fresh sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Fresh or Microsoft?
Fresh sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Fresh or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Fresh (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Fresh or Microsoft?
Fresh sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Fresh or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 855 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Fresh or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Fresh scores higher on overall composite score while Fresh may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback