| Metric | Frontify | PCI Proxy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 20 | 28 | PCI Proxy |
| Accessibility | 84 | 94 | PCI Proxy |
| Best Practices | 73 | 77 | PCI Proxy |
| SEO | 81 | 85 | PCI Proxy |
| Security | 70 | 70 | Tie |
| TTFB | 589ms | 704ms | Frontify |
| Composite | 70 | 70 | Tie |
PCI Proxy outperforms Frontify in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 70). Frontify leads in TTFB.
Choose Frontify when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose PCI Proxy when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Frontify sites and 1 audited PCI Proxy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback