Skip to content

FullStory vs Microsoft Advertising

Based on 14 and 240 real audits

View FullStory details | View Microsoft Advertising details
MetricFullStoryMicrosoft AdvertisingWinner
Performance2832Microsoft Advertising
Accessibility9189FullStory
Best Practices8679FullStory
SEO9390FullStory
Security6465Microsoft Advertising
TTFB367ms317msMicrosoft Advertising
Composite7172Microsoft Advertising
Performance
FullStory
28
Microsoft Advertising
32
Accessibility
FullStory
91
Microsoft Advertising
89
Security
FullStory
64
Microsoft Advertising
65
SEO
FullStory
93
Microsoft Advertising
90
Composite
FullStory
71
Microsoft Advertising
72

Microsoft Advertising outperforms FullStory in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). FullStory leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.

When to choose FullStory

Choose FullStory when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft Advertising

Choose Microsoft Advertising when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 14 audited FullStory sites and 240 audited Microsoft Advertising sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, FullStory or Microsoft Advertising?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft Advertising sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, FullStory or Microsoft Advertising?
Microsoft Advertising sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, FullStory or Microsoft Advertising?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor FullStory (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, FullStory or Microsoft Advertising?
FullStory sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), FullStory or Microsoft Advertising?
Microsoft Advertising sites show lower Time to First Byte (317 ms vs 367 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose FullStory or Microsoft Advertising for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft Advertising scores higher on overall composite score while FullStory may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback