| Metric | FullStory | Webpack | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 38 | Webpack |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | FullStory |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | Webpack |
| SEO | 93 | 92 | FullStory |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Webpack |
| TTFB | 367ms | 305ms | Webpack |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | Webpack |
Webpack outperforms FullStory in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). FullStory leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose FullStory when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Webpack when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 14 audited FullStory sites and 956 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback