Skip to content

FullStory vs Webpack

Based on 14 and 1011 real audits

MetricFullStoryWebpackWinner
Performance2839Webpack
Accessibility9189FullStory
Best Practices8687Webpack
SEO9393Tie
Security6467Webpack
TTFB367ms318msWebpack
Composite7174Webpack
Performance
FullStory
28
Webpack
39
Accessibility
FullStory
91
Webpack
89
Security
FullStory
64
Webpack
67
SEO
FullStory
93
Webpack
93
Composite
FullStory
71
Webpack
74

Webpack outperforms FullStory in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). FullStory leads in accessibility.

When to choose FullStory

Choose FullStory when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Webpack

Choose Webpack when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 14 audited FullStory sites and 1011 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, FullStory or Webpack?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Webpack sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, FullStory or Webpack?
Webpack sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, FullStory or Webpack?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor FullStory (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, FullStory or Webpack?
FullStory sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 93 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), FullStory or Webpack?
Webpack sites show lower Time to First Byte (318 ms vs 367 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose FullStory or Webpack for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Webpack scores higher on overall composite score while FullStory may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback