Based on 201 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Funding Choices | Primis | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 28 | Funding Choices |
| Accessibility | 85 | 84 | Funding Choices |
| Best Practices | 79 | 68 | Funding Choices |
| SEO | 91 | 86 | Funding Choices |
| Security | 63 | 62 | Funding Choices |
| TTFB | 358ms | 173ms | Primis |
| Composite | 71 | 70 | Funding Choices |
Funding Choices outperforms Primis in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). Primis leads in TTFB.
Choose Funding Choices when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Primis when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 201 audited Funding Choices sites and 3 audited Primis sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback