Based on 204 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Funding Choices | Verizon Media | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 31 | Funding Choices |
| Accessibility | 85 | 70 | Funding Choices |
| Best Practices | 79 | 73 | Funding Choices |
| SEO | 91 | 100 | Verizon Media |
| Security | 63 | 67 | Verizon Media |
| TTFB | 366ms | 510ms | Funding Choices |
| Composite | 71 | 70 | Funding Choices |
Funding Choices outperforms Verizon Media in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). Verizon Media leads in SEO, security.
Choose Funding Choices when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Verizon Media when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 204 audited Funding Choices sites and 1 audited Verizon Media sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback