Based on 7 and 3415 real audits
| Metric | Gannett CMS | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 45 | Gannett CMS |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 93 | 87 | Gannett CMS |
| SEO | 51 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 70 | 66 | Gannett CMS |
| TTFB | 117ms | 365ms | Gannett CMS |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Open Graph |
Gannett CMS outperforms Open Graph in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Open Graph leads in accessibility, SEO, composite score.
Choose Gannett CMS when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 7 audited Gannett CMS sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback