Based on 35 and 2504 real audits
| Metric | Gatsby | Google Tag Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 40 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 91 | 88 | Gatsby |
| Best Practices | 90 | 86 | Gatsby |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Gatsby |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Gatsby |
| TTFB | 232ms | 372ms | Gatsby |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Gatsby |
Gatsby outperforms Google Tag Manager in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in no categories.
Choose Gatsby when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Google Tag Manager doesn't clearly lead Gatsby in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 35 audited Gatsby sites and 2504 audited Google Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback