Skip to content

Gatsby vs Microsoft

Based on 37 and 2523 real audits

MetricGatsbyMicrosoftWinner
Performance4240Gatsby
Accessibility9189Gatsby
Best Practices9086Gatsby
SEO9389Gatsby
Security6667Microsoft
TTFB253ms333msGatsby
Composite7573Gatsby
Performance
Gatsby
42
Microsoft
40
Accessibility
Gatsby
91
Microsoft
89
Security
Gatsby
66
Microsoft
67
SEO
Gatsby
93
Microsoft
89
Composite
Gatsby
75
Microsoft
73

Gatsby outperforms Microsoft in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Microsoft leads in security.

When to choose Gatsby

Choose Gatsby when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 37 audited Gatsby sites and 2523 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Gatsby or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Gatsby sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Gatsby or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Gatsby or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Gatsby (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Gatsby or Microsoft?
Gatsby sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Gatsby or Microsoft?
Gatsby sites show lower Time to First Byte (253 ms vs 333 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Gatsby or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Gatsby scores higher on overall composite score while Gatsby may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback