| Metric | Gauges | HTTP/3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 73 | 52 | Gauges |
| Accessibility | 84 | 88 | HTTP/3 |
| Best Practices | 98 | 88 | Gauges |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 70 | HTTP/3 |
| TTFB | 135ms | 321ms | Gauges |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | HTTP/3 |
Gauges and HTTP/3 are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Gauges has a composite score of 74 while HTTP/3 scores 76.
Choose Gauges when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Gauges sites and 1646 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback