Based on 6 and 284 real audits
| Metric | GeneratePress | Yoast SEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 45 | GeneratePress |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | GeneratePress |
| Best Practices | 91 | 87 | GeneratePress |
| SEO | 96 | 90 | GeneratePress |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 210ms | 388ms | GeneratePress |
| Composite | 77 | 75 | GeneratePress |
GeneratePress outperforms Yoast SEO in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Yoast SEO leads in no categories.
Choose GeneratePress when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Yoast SEO doesn't clearly lead GeneratePress in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 6 audited GeneratePress sites and 284 audited Yoast SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback