Based on 1 and 1 real audits
| Metric | GetResponse | pickadate.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 43 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 72 | 72 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 73 | 73 | Tie |
| SEO | 77 | 77 | Tie |
| Security | 69 | 69 | Tie |
| TTFB | 8567ms | 8567ms | Tie |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
GetResponse and pickadate.js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. GetResponse has a composite score of 73 while pickadate.js scores 73.
GetResponse doesn't clearly lead pickadate.js in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
pickadate.js doesn't clearly lead GetResponse in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited GetResponse sites and 1 audited pickadate.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback