Skip to content

Ghost vs jsDelivr CDN

Based on 3 and 349 real audits

MetricGhostjsDelivr CDNWinner
Performance5738Ghost
Accessibility9488Ghost
Best Practices9286Ghost
SEO9291Ghost
Security6065jsDelivr CDN
TTFB277ms360msGhost
Composite7573Ghost
Performance
Ghost
57
jsDelivr CDN
38
Accessibility
Ghost
94
jsDelivr CDN
88
Security
Ghost
60
jsDelivr CDN
65
SEO
Ghost
92
jsDelivr CDN
91
Composite
Ghost
75
jsDelivr CDN
73

Ghost outperforms jsDelivr CDN in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). jsDelivr CDN leads in security.

When to choose Ghost

Choose Ghost when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose jsDelivr CDN

Choose jsDelivr CDN when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited Ghost sites and 349 audited jsDelivr CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Ghost or jsDelivr CDN?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Ghost sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (57 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Ghost or jsDelivr CDN?
jsDelivr CDN sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Ghost or jsDelivr CDN?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Ghost (94 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Ghost or jsDelivr CDN?
Ghost sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Ghost or jsDelivr CDN?
Ghost sites show lower Time to First Byte (277 ms vs 360 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Ghost or jsDelivr CDN for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Ghost scores higher on overall composite score while Ghost may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback