Skip to content

Ghost vs RSS

Based on 3 and 801 real audits

View Ghost details | View RSS details
MetricGhostRSSWinner
Performance5747Ghost
Accessibility9488Ghost
Best Practices9288Ghost
SEO9291Ghost
Security6064RSS
TTFB277ms296msGhost
Composite7574Ghost
Performance
Ghost
57
RSS
47
Accessibility
Ghost
94
RSS
88
Security
Ghost
60
RSS
64
SEO
Ghost
92
RSS
91
Composite
Ghost
75
RSS
74

Ghost outperforms RSS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). RSS leads in security.

When to choose Ghost

Choose Ghost when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose RSS

Choose RSS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited Ghost sites and 801 audited RSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Ghost or RSS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Ghost sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (57 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Ghost or RSS?
RSS sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Ghost or RSS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Ghost (94 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Ghost or RSS?
Ghost sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Ghost or RSS?
Ghost sites show lower Time to First Byte (277 ms vs 296 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Ghost or RSS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Ghost scores higher on overall composite score while Ghost may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback