Based on 31 and 446 real audits
| Metric | GitHub Pages | Varnish | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 76 | 44 | GitHub Pages |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 95 | 89 | GitHub Pages |
| SEO | 96 | 91 | GitHub Pages |
| Security | 65 | 66 | Varnish |
| TTFB | 180ms | 202ms | GitHub Pages |
| Composite | 78 | 74 | GitHub Pages |
GitHub Pages outperforms Varnish in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Varnish leads in security.
Choose GitHub Pages when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Varnish when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 31 audited GitHub Pages sites and 446 audited Varnish sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback