| Metric | GitLab | HTTP/3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 51 | HTTP/3 |
| Accessibility | 79 | 88 | HTTP/3 |
| Best Practices | 92 | 88 | GitLab |
| SEO | 100 | 90 | GitLab |
| Security | 77 | 69 | GitLab |
| TTFB | 309ms | 305ms | HTTP/3 |
| Composite | 79 | 75 | GitLab |
GitLab outperforms HTTP/3 in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). HTTP/3 leads in performance, accessibility, TTFB.
Choose GitLab when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited GitLab sites and 1542 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback