Based on 45 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Glide.js | Locomotive Scroll | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 41 | Locomotive Scroll |
| Accessibility | 90 | 81 | Glide.js |
| Best Practices | 84 | 88 | Locomotive Scroll |
| SEO | 90 | 84 | Glide.js |
| Security | 66 | 70 | Locomotive Scroll |
| TTFB | 308ms | 287ms | Locomotive Scroll |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Locomotive Scroll |
Locomotive Scroll outperforms Glide.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Glide.js leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Glide.js when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Locomotive Scroll when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 45 audited Glide.js sites and 2 audited Locomotive Scroll sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback