Skip to content

Go vs HSTS

Based on 20 and 3098 real audits

View Go details | View HSTS details
MetricGoHSTSWinner
Performance6152Go
Accessibility8289HSTS
Best Practices8989Tie
SEO9192HSTS
Security6873HSTS
TTFB881ms396msHSTS
Composite7477HSTS
Performance
Go
61
HSTS
52
Accessibility
Go
82
HSTS
89
Security
Go
68
HSTS
73
SEO
Go
91
HSTS
92
Composite
Go
74
HSTS
77

HSTS outperforms Go in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Go leads in performance.

When to choose Go

Choose Go when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 20 audited Go sites and 3098 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Go or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Go sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (61 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, Go or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Go or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Go or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Go or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (396 ms vs 881 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Go or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Go scores higher on overall composite score while Go may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback