Skip to content

Go vs Microsoft

Based on 17 and 2421 real audits

View Go details | View Microsoft details
MetricGoMicrosoftWinner
Performance5939Go
Accessibility8289Microsoft
Best Practices8986Go
SEO9189Go
Security6666Tie
TTFB957ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7372Go
Performance
Go
59
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Go
82
Microsoft
89
Security
Go
66
Microsoft
66
SEO
Go
91
Microsoft
89
Composite
Go
73
Microsoft
72

Go outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Microsoft leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Go

Choose Go when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 17 audited Go sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Go or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Go sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (59 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Go or Microsoft?
Go sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Go or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Go or Microsoft?
Go sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Go or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 957 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Go or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Go scores higher on overall composite score while Go may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback