| Metric | GoDaddy | Kiwi Sizing | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 30 | GoDaddy |
| Accessibility | 83 | 89 | Kiwi Sizing |
| Best Practices | 87 | 73 | GoDaddy |
| SEO | 92 | 85 | GoDaddy |
| Security | 71 | 82 | Kiwi Sizing |
| TTFB | 599ms | 965ms | GoDaddy |
| Composite | 76 | 81 | Kiwi Sizing |
GoDaddy outperforms Kiwi Sizing in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 81). Kiwi Sizing leads in accessibility, security, composite score.
Choose GoDaddy when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kiwi Sizing when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 118 audited GoDaddy sites and 1 audited Kiwi Sizing sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback