| Metric | GoKwik | HTTP/3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 62 | 55 | GoKwik |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 86 | 89 | HTTP/3 |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | GoKwik |
| Security | 77 | 72 | GoKwik |
| TTFB | 419ms | 335ms | HTTP/3 |
| Composite | 79 | 77 | GoKwik |
GoKwik outperforms HTTP/3 in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 77). HTTP/3 leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose GoKwik when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited GoKwik sites and 1888 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback