| Metric | GoKwik | HTTP/3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 57 | 50 | GoKwik |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | GoKwik |
| Best Practices | 96 | 88 | GoKwik |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | GoKwik |
| Security | 71 | 68 | GoKwik |
| TTFB | 735ms | 282ms | HTTP/3 |
| Composite | 76 | 75 | GoKwik |
GoKwik outperforms HTTP/3 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). HTTP/3 leads in TTFB.
Choose GoKwik when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited GoKwik sites and 1395 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback