| Metric | Gomag | theMarketer | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| SEO | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 75 | 75 | Tie |
| TTFB | 569ms | 569ms | Tie |
| Composite | 79 | 79 | Tie |
Gomag and theMarketer are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Gomag has a composite score of 79 while theMarketer scores 79.
Gomag doesn't clearly lead theMarketer in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
theMarketer doesn't clearly lead Gomag in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Gomag sites and 1 audited theMarketer sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback