Based on 139 and 98 real audits
| Metric | Goober | HubSpot Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 35 | HubSpot Analytics |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Goober |
| Best Practices | 82 | 80 | Goober |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | Goober |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 280ms | 304ms | Goober |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | HubSpot Analytics |
Goober outperforms HubSpot Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). HubSpot Analytics leads in performance, composite score.
Choose Goober when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HubSpot Analytics when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 139 audited Goober sites and 98 audited HubSpot Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback