Based on 191 and 12 real audits
| Metric | Goober | HubSpot CMS Hub | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 38 | HubSpot CMS Hub |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Goober |
| Best Practices | 84 | 83 | Goober |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Goober |
| Security | 69 | 69 | Tie |
| TTFB | 307ms | 285ms | HubSpot CMS Hub |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Goober outperforms HubSpot CMS Hub in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). HubSpot CMS Hub leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose Goober when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HubSpot CMS Hub when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 191 audited Goober sites and 12 audited HubSpot CMS Hub sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback