Based on 140 and 12 real audits
| Metric | Goober | HubSpot CMS Hub | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 38 | HubSpot CMS Hub |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Goober |
| Best Practices | 82 | 83 | HubSpot CMS Hub |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 69 | HubSpot CMS Hub |
| TTFB | 282ms | 285ms | Goober |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | HubSpot CMS Hub |
HubSpot CMS Hub outperforms Goober in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Goober leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Goober when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HubSpot CMS Hub when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 140 audited Goober sites and 12 audited HubSpot CMS Hub sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback