Based on 140 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Goober | Lemon Squeezy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 56 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Accessibility | 89 | 100 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Best Practices | 82 | 96 | Lemon Squeezy |
| SEO | 91 | 83 | Goober |
| Security | 65 | 59 | Goober |
| TTFB | 282ms | 242ms | Lemon Squeezy |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Lemon Squeezy outperforms Goober in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Goober leads in SEO, security.
Choose Goober when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Lemon Squeezy when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 140 audited Goober sites and 1 audited Lemon Squeezy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback