Based on 105 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Ads | Systeme.io | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 37 | Google Ads |
| Accessibility | 86 | 80 | Google Ads |
| Best Practices | 87 | 81 | Google Ads |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 65 | Google Ads |
| TTFB | 529ms | 123ms | Systeme.io |
| Composite | 76 | 69 | Google Ads |
Google Ads outperforms Systeme.io in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 69). Systeme.io leads in TTFB.
Choose Google Ads when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Systeme.io when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 105 audited Google Ads sites and 1 audited Systeme.io sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback