Based on 147 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Google AdSense | iAdvize | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 43 | iAdvize |
| Accessibility | 84 | 91 | iAdvize |
| Best Practices | 85 | 84 | Google AdSense |
| SEO | 92 | 84 | Google AdSense |
| Security | 63 | 62 | Google AdSense |
| TTFB | 379ms | 471ms | Google AdSense |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | Google AdSense |
Google AdSense outperforms iAdvize in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). iAdvize leads in performance, accessibility.
Choose Google AdSense when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose iAdvize when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 147 audited Google AdSense sites and 2 audited iAdvize sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback