Based on 165 and 5 real audits
| Metric | Google AdSense | OpenGSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 58 | OpenGSE |
| Accessibility | 85 | 89 | OpenGSE |
| Best Practices | 85 | 99 | OpenGSE |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | Google AdSense |
| Security | 65 | 74 | OpenGSE |
| TTFB | 386ms | 491ms | Google AdSense |
| Composite | 73 | 75 | OpenGSE |
OpenGSE outperforms Google AdSense in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Google AdSense leads in SEO, TTFB.
Choose Google AdSense when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose OpenGSE when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 165 audited Google AdSense sites and 5 audited OpenGSE sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback