Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Google Maps

Based on 1989 and 40 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Google Maps details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsGoogle MapsWinner
Performance4145Google Maps
Accessibility8786Google Analytics
Best Practices8691Google Maps
SEO9193Google Maps
Security6572Google Maps
TTFB425ms798msGoogle Analytics
Composite7376Google Maps
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Google Maps
45
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Google Maps
86
Security
Google Analytics
65
Google Maps
72
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Google Maps
93
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Google Maps
76

Google Maps outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Maps

Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1989 audited Google Analytics sites and 40 audited Google Maps sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Google Maps?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Google Maps?
Google Maps sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Google Maps?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Google Maps?
Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Google Maps?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (425 ms vs 798 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Google Maps for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Maps scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback