Based on 1936 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | Gumlet | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 24 | Google Analytics |
| Accessibility | 87 | 80 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 85 | 77 | Google Analytics |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | Google Analytics |
| Security | 65 | 68 | Gumlet |
| TTFB | 406ms | 369ms | Gumlet |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Google Analytics outperforms Gumlet in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Gumlet leads in security, TTFB.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Gumlet when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1936 audited Google Analytics sites and 2 audited Gumlet sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback