Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Happy Returns

Based on 1936 and 2 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Happy Returns details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsHappy ReturnsWinner
Performance4126Google Analytics
Accessibility8767Google Analytics
Best Practices8586Happy Returns
SEO9192Happy Returns
Security6576Happy Returns
TTFB406ms189msHappy Returns
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Happy Returns
26
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Happy Returns
67
Security
Google Analytics
65
Happy Returns
76
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Happy Returns
92
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Happy Returns
73

Happy Returns outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in performance, accessibility.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Happy Returns

Choose Happy Returns when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1936 audited Google Analytics sites and 2 audited Happy Returns sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Happy Returns?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 26 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Happy Returns?
Happy Returns sites score higher on security analysis (76 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Happy Returns?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 67). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Happy Returns?
Happy Returns sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Happy Returns?
Happy Returns sites show lower Time to First Byte (189 ms vs 406 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Happy Returns for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback