Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Helix Ultimate

Based on 2004 and 1 real audits

MetricGoogle AnalyticsHelix UltimateWinner
Performance4154Helix Ultimate
Accessibility8795Helix Ultimate
Best Practices8696Helix Ultimate
SEO91100Helix Ultimate
Security6577Helix Ultimate
TTFB413ms2331msGoogle Analytics
Composite7379Helix Ultimate
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Helix Ultimate
54
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Helix Ultimate
95
Security
Google Analytics
65
Helix Ultimate
77
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Helix Ultimate
100
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Helix Ultimate
79

Helix Ultimate outperforms Google Analytics in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Helix Ultimate

Choose Helix Ultimate when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2004 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited Helix Ultimate sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Helix Ultimate?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Helix Ultimate sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Helix Ultimate?
Helix Ultimate sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Helix Ultimate?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Helix Ultimate (95 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Helix Ultimate?
Helix Ultimate sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Helix Ultimate?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (413 ms vs 2331 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Helix Ultimate for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Helix Ultimate scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback